.

Local Group Sues UC Regents Over UCLA Conference Center Approval

Save Westwood Village is suing the Regents of the University of California.

Arguing that it's not in the University of California's mission to operate hotels, local nonprofit Save Westwood Village has filed a lawsuit against the Regents of the University of California, hoping to overturn previous approval of a UCLA conference center project.

The lawsuit filed last week alleges the Meyer and Renee Luskin Conference and Guest Center, which would include 250 guest rooms, "is completely inconsistent with the core mission of the University of California."

"This is the only option left," said Laura Lake, co-president of Save Westwood Village. "We believe the impacts on public safety, on the business climate in Westwood, (and on) the city treasury all combine to make it necessary to challenge UCLA. It's not the University of Hyatt, it’s the University of California."

Follow us on Twitter | Like us on Facebook | Sign up for our newsletter | Blog for us

The seven-story building with 25,000 square feet of meeting space is expected to break ground next summer and be completed by 2016. Part of a $100 million gift from alumni Meyer and Renee Luskin will be used to finance the project, in addition to bond financing.

The lawsuit challenges the Board of Regents' previous approval of the conference and guest center's final design plans and environmental impact report (EIR). It calls on the Regents to rescind approval given in September.

"We’d like to reopen the approval and have (the Board of Regents) look at sensible alternatives," Lake said. "We want a dialogue."

UCLA cited the Board of Regents "thorough review" of the project EIR, financing and design.

"While UCLA needs time to review the complaint, we are confident that the final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) that we prepared for the Meyer and Renee Luskin Conference and Guest Center project is fully compliant with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and all applicable laws and requirements, including public input," the university said in a statement.

The lawsuit alleges the conference and guest center is required to charge local transient occupancy and tourism taxes, from which UC officials have said the university is exempt.

"The hotel tax has a profound impact on the environment by funding vital city services, including emergency fire and police service," Lake said in an email. 

The lawsuit claims environmental report documents did not take into account the inadequacy of fire protection services in Westwood, which would be "exacerbated" by the conference center project.

"With the addition of the Luskin hotel to existing campus hotels, UCLA deprives the city of millions of dollars needed for our firefighters and other critical city services," Lake said in the email.

It also alleges not enough time was spent looking into site alternatives. The $152 million center is currently planned to be built on what is now the location of Parking Structure 6.

The university addressed some local hotels' concerns that the UCLA conference center would have an unfair advantage in the Westwood market

"The center would not compete with local hotels for tourists and other business travelers, as guests must have an appropriate affiliation with the university in order to book a room, similar to existing policies at the UCLA Guest House and Tiverton House," the university said in a statement. 

The UCLA statement also criticized Save Westwood Village's decision to name the Luskins as parties in the case.

"It is a shame that individuals who acted out of such enormous generosity and dedication to UCLA are now being needlessly dragged into this ill-conceived litigation," it said. 

What do you think of the conference center project? Tell us in the comments section below.

Judith October 16, 2012 at 09:07 PM
What business does a UC campus have to build and operate a hotel on the campus or anywhere? And the bigger question is, how can they justify using bond money for this?
Diane SALTZBURG November 13, 2012 at 06:40 AM
the whole idea ("conference center") Hotel - on the UCLA campus - which will be the largest Hotel in Los Angeles - including swimming pool, conference rooms, restaurant(s), is such a sham to the neighborhood, adding more traffic than the streets can handle - disregarding the purpose of the University to provide classrooms to educate. I think the pre-earthquake hospital is still in existence - I bet Luskin's money could easily turn that into a "hotel" - UCLA just purchased the Burger King building - that could be renovated for a "hotel"?? Why is the University system crying poverty, raising tuition, while spending millions of dollars on frivolous structures??? diane saltzburg

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something