.
News Alert
UPDATED: Fire Shuts Down 405 Transition to the 105

Rough Ride for Century City Subway Stop

A conflict over the location of the line's Century City stop is pitting businesses and property owners against riders.

Plans to move forward with the long-anticipated subway extension in West Los Angeles have barely been approved, but a conflict over the location of the line's Century City stop is already pitting businesses and property owners against riders.

The two main options for the stop are at the intersection of Avenue of the Stars and Constellation Boulevard or at Avenue of the Stars and Santa Monica Boulevard. The Constellation stop would be in the center of busy Century City, near the Hyatt Regency Century Plaza Hotel. 

However, it would also require tunneling below Beverly Hills High School. The Santa Monica alternative stop would be only two-tenths of a mile away, but along Santa Monica Boulevard at the edge of the Los Angeles Country Club, perhaps drawing fewer riders. The club's policy is to not issue statements regarding outside businesses, and its personnel would not comment for this article.   

Since Constellation and Santa Monica boulevards run parallel to each other, it is not possible to tunnel under Santa Monica Boulevard to a stop at Constellation, as the route would have to turn, according to Dave Sotero, the Metropolitan Transportation Authority's senior public information officer.

The MTA board voted on and approved proceeding with the Westside Extension on Oct. 28 and will spend the next several months reviewing environmental reports. A decision on where to construct the Century City stop is expected in the next 10 months. 

"We've been discussing the subway for 50 years, one way or another," said Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa, who also serves as the MTA board vice chair.  "People said it wouldn't happen. Now, the only question is when." 

Century City property owners are adamant that a Metro station at Santa Monica Boulevard and Avenue of the Stars is poorly located, will negatively impact their businesses and produce low ridership. 

"If you're going to have a subway, you want to put it in a location where you get the most passengers to use it," said Susan Bursk, president and CEO of the Century City Chamber of Commerce. 

With about 50,000 workers in Century City, proponents claim a stop at Constellation would attract more passengers, even enough of them to make the extension more cost effective, based on government funding models.  

The chamber's board of directors is working with the MTA and representing Century City. It's mostly made up of property managers and employees of companies with offices in Century City, and has more than 50 members. 

"I know some people think, 'Well, it's only one block," but it's not just one block, it is a huge mega-block…you have people who will drive one block," Bursk said. Making it as easy as possible for potential riders to use the subway will also make a Constellation stop more cost effective, she said. "People want to be able to go where they want to go, and if you have to take them someplace much farther from where their destination is, I think they're less likely to use it," Bursk said.

Additionally, she said that Century City employees could use the subway during the workday instead of driving to downtown meetings.

Some experts agree. "It's probably, from a ridership perspective, the most ideal because it has the most access," Lisa Schweitzer, a sustainable transportation expert at USC, said in an interview.   

But building a stop at Constellation and Avenue of the Stars requires drilling under Beverly Hills High School, where 2,200 students are enrolled. Many Beverly Hills residents and its board of education are adamantly opposed to any tunneling under their homes or the school.  Their main concern is safety for their children, and they cite MTA's past construction accidents as reasons to tunnel under Santa Monica Boulevard instead. While tunneling to build the Red Line, the MTA ran into trouble.  There was the 1985 methane gas explosion; then, in 1995, an 80-foot sinkhole developed on Hollywood Boulevard. 

They also note the school is the city's emergency preparedness center.  These centers are fully equipped in case of a natural disaster or terrorist attack and can be used as a shelter or for emergency response. The high school is the largest such center in Beverly Hills.

It is common worldwide to have subway lines running under entire cities, and the MTA says it will continue studying potential safety hazards, including oil wells' subsurface gases in order to ease citizens' concerns about construction. "It is possible to tunnel and operate a subway along the Wilshire Corridor safely," a 2005 American Public Transit Association Peer Review Panel concluded.

Yet many Beverly Hills residents remain unconvinced. "The MTA has not shown us, the Beverly Hills School District, and has not demonstrated to the community through the multiple means they've had, why the Century City route is a better route," said Brian Goldberg, a Beverly Hills School District board of education member.    

As a result, Beverly Hills residents are mounting fierce opposition. They hired an attorney from Best Best & Krieger to review the MTA's environmental report and contacted state Attorney General Jerry Brown about imminent domain rights to the land under the school. At the time of this story's posting, the school board had not received a reply from him.  They are also considering sending lobbyists to Sacramento and possibly Washington, D.C. The board of education is leading this effort. Money to cover these costs, which are estimated at $500,000, will either come from fundraising or it will be taken from the board's general fund. 

The issue has galvanized residents more than any other in recent years, Goldberg said. "In the time that I've lived in Beverly Hills and the time that I've served on the school board, I have never seen the community rally around an issue and bring together a community in the way the MTA's plan to tunnel under our high school and homes has," he said. 

The school board supports three construction alternatives to the stop at Constellation. The first is building an entrance from the Santa Monica stop in the direction of Constellation. Another is building a moving sidewalk to shuttle riders to Constellation, and the third is tunneling under Santa Monica Boulevard, but building the stop at Constellation, according to Goldberg.

"There really is no justification for tunneling under a high school, except that wealthy developers in Century City want it in the middle of Century City in front of their buildings, said Goldberg. "Unfortunately I think this comes down to money, instead of what's in the public's best interest."   

"We can't let this discussion stop the development of public transit to the Westside of L.A.," said Schweitzer of USC. "You do not want wealthy, very mobile homeowners on the Westside of L.A. deciding where all the transit users in the region are going to be able to go, and where they're not going to be able to go."

By 2035, it is estimated the project will generate almost 53,000 passenger boardings at new stations along the extension, the MTA's Sotero said. The projected cost is $4.2 billion in 2009 dollars. Construction could start as early as 2013, and if Metro secures advance federal funding, the extension to the Westwood area may be completed by 2022.

John E. Kerr December 27, 2010 at 04:52 PM
Just to let you know, the MTA did NOT cause the 1985 methane explosion. That happened during planning for the Red Line and was used, mostly by BH NIMBYs as a way to stop Metro from building a westside subway branch decades ago.
LAofAnaheim December 27, 2010 at 06:10 PM
"There really is no justification for tunneling under a high school, except that wealthy developers in Century City want it in the middle of Century City in front of their buildings" - No. It's in the PUBLIC's best interest that a station is located in the "Center of the Center", which is Avenue of the Stars and Constellation. The northern side of Santa Monica boulevard is a public golf course...no ridership is there. Avenue of the Stars / Constellation has ridership potential on all 4 sides; north, south, east, and west. Beverly Hills (esp. Goldberg) is delusional to say it's not the public best interests to be at Constellation. Maybe Goldberg and his small army think Metro is pandering to business interests...but it's not! This took years of Alternative Analysis research and feedback from Los Angeles residents that they want the most convenient station possible....which is Constellation. Beverly Hills is acting selfish and not thinking about the greater good of Los Angeles. They live in LA county...not Beverly Hills walls.
Joel Epstein December 27, 2010 at 07:05 PM
Constellation Blvd Is the Best Choice for the Wilshire Subway Century. Read why: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/joel-epstein/why-constellation-blvd-av_b_770651.html
Minoter December 28, 2010 at 12:49 AM
A vast majority of Westside homeowners want the subway station at Constellation for obvious reasons stated above. To tie us in with BH and their legal team is unfair and irresponsible reporting. Not only have HOAs endorsed the Constellation choice, so has the Westwood Neighborhood Council and Councilmember Paul Koretz. Just the mention of BH lobbying Sacramento and Washington is pathetic.
Carol Spencer December 28, 2010 at 01:36 AM
This article did not mention the fact that if the Subway station is built on Santa Monica Blvd at Ave of the Stars the station would be located directly on top of, parallel to the Santa Monica Fault Line. The EIR states that this is an ACTIVE Earthquake Fault line. Also that the only safe way to cross an Earthquake fault is perpendicular to the fault. No other Subway stations are built on top of an Earthquake Fault any place in the world. Beverly Hills is not considering the safety of the Rider in the event of an earthquake.
Tom Pease December 28, 2010 at 02:14 AM
I walk further than two-tenths of a mile to catch a bus to work. Why? Work pays for part of the pass (carrot) and charges a lot to park (stick). Writing that somehow someone who works at ICM will decide to keep driving because the stop isn't right at their feet is ludicrous- do they all <b>live</b> atop a subway stop? I mean, please; they walk further to get to the Mall Food Court for lunch. As for that "active" fault line, it's "active" every 6000 years, which is why the city of LA is allowing developers to build 40 story buildings on it. The Santa Monica alignment costs less, meets up with six bus lines serving the Westside and is facing no opposition from the "NIMBY's" in Beverly Hills, indeed, we're welcoming it including the two stops <i>IN</i> Beverly Hills. While everyone goes around registering on every site on the internets simply to insult the residents of BH as "selfish", remember, we have the right to be heard and to have an opinion, just as the CEO of the Century City Chamber of Commerce has to theirs. Flame away...
Scott Mercer December 29, 2010 at 04:28 AM
"While tunneling to build the Red Line, the MTA ran into trouble. There was the 1985 methane gas explosion; then, in 1995, an 80-foot sinkhole developed on Hollywood Boulevard." The 1985 methane gas explosion had NOTHING to do with the MTA, or subways, or tunneling, or even digging below ground. There was a small methane explosion in the basement at the Ross store on Third Street near Fairfax, causing minor damage. The store was closed for I believe ONE DAY, and that Ross Store is still there. Nothing like that has happened since. That incident however did freak out a lot of people, and caused the subway to be re-routed away from Wilshire Boulevard ...only now, 25 years later, is there any plan to bring it back along that route, where it should have gone in the first place. There was a sinkhole on Hollywood Bouelvard. It was repaired. In 2009, Metro built the subway in Boyle Heights, with no problems like that. Different types of tunneling machines were used in 1995 and 2009. So, which precedent is relevant? The 1995 sinkhole, or the 2009 subway built on time, under budget, with no damage, and no worker deaths or injuries on the entire project? Couldn't it be JUST POSSIBLE that Metro learned from their mistakes and nothing like will happen again?

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something